From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May  5 14:07:47 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA09783
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 14:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pcpsj.pfcs.com (2LsZYXHusUpMBJnVM3baORLEsh7KIM+Z@harlan.fred.net [205.252.219.31])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA09728
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 5 May 1998 14:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com)
Received: from mumps.pfcs.com [192.52.69.11] (HELO mumps.pfcs.com)
	by pcpsj.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP
	id <RAA00398-Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>;
	Tue, 5 May 1998 17:07:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brown.pfcs.com [192.52.69.44] (HELO brown.pfcs.com)
	by mumps.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP
	id <OAA09531-harlan@pfcs.com>;
	Tue, 5 May 1998 14:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (HELO brown.pfcs.com)
	by brown.pfcs.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) via ESMTP
	id <RAA29653-harlan@pfcs.com>;
	Tue, 5 May 1998 17:07:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
cc: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: should we update xntp in the base system to newest ntp version ? 
In-Reply-To: Andreas Klemm's (andreas@klemm.gtn.com) message
	dated Tue, 05 May 1998 22:44:18.  <19980505224418.A719@klemm.gtn.com> 
X-Face: "csXK}xnnsH\h_ce`T#|pM]tG,6Xu.{3Rb\]&XJgVyTS'w{E+|-(}n<m88'RZQA.<2]zo&R
 I8nHuPumSNjsAN&WGhll?v}1#%)~2%QI~4Vs%IuWb#OmZmKck_1Ee&C\k&vJ}BWx:Bb#Mx8>:c(Cc*
 $cbtusxDP6T)Hr'k&zrwq0.3&~bAI~YJco[r.mE+K|(q]F=ZNXug:s6tyOk{VTqARy0#axm6BWti9C
 d
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 17:07:25 -0400
Message-ID: <29649.894402445@brown.pfcs.com>
From: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Possibly it's more efficient to keep the working ntp3 version in
> current. Why upgrade to a newer version 3 and then updating to v4 ?
> 
> Too much movement in the base OS.

There are Bugs in the 3.4y code that is part of the existing FreeBSD 
distribution

> > The latest ntp4 code is *not* export restricted.  It only uses md5.
> 
> And DES. When I read the notes correctly DES _and_ MD5 are default
> configure options. Maybe I'm wrong, but configure --help told me so.

The 4.0.72g (and later) code DOES NOT use or include DES.  The 
documentation (and configure.in) is out of date.

I Know.

H


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message