From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 2 15:16:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59DE16A468 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F8F13C4BA for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 14125 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2007 10:16:31 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (210.84.50.231) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Jul 2007 10:16:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:16:27 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20070703011627.5f3b8863@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070702145725.U31116@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20070703005147.4427314f@localhost> <20070702145725.U31116@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current round of IPsec checkins complete... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:16:31 -0000 On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:10:22 +0900 > > gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > > > >> Please let myself of bz@ know of any issues. I'm attempting a build > >> of a fresh tree now. > > > > Great , thanks for all the time and effort invested :) > > > > One question, is NAT Traversal supported now on -STABLE without the patches that are floating around ? > > no. You will need patches for FreeBSD7. > thanks. Just to be clear, do you mean 'NATT patches only available for -CURRENT', or 'NATT patches for -CURRENT should apply OK in -STABLE' ? cheers, _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The only people that never change are the stupid and the dead" Jorge Luis Borges. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.