From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 14:41:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A87106568F; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A358FC0A; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D07FA46B29; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:41:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA2538A029; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:41:16 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Randy Bush Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:40:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200906010014.n510EMwp065193@www.freebsd.org> <200906010925.25343.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906011040.07167.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:41:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/135124: lor vfs_bio/ufs_dirhash X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:41:18 -0000 On Monday 01 June 2009 10:30:21 am Randy Bush wrote: > >> i think this may be different than 261 > >> > > It is not, it is the same exact LOR. > > apologies No worries. :) -- John Baldwin