From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 04:11:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45C81065671 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from bulwark.hamla.org (bulwark.hamla.org [69.55.228.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A028FC18 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from localhost (bulwark [69.55.228.210]) by bulwark.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE4E1CD4A; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:11:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at bulwark.hamla.org Received: from bulwark.hamla.org ([69.55.228.210]) by localhost (bulwark.hamla.org [69.55.228.210]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Tc3mx1OerCCo; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:11:14 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: Wesley Shields Message-ID: <20080606041113.GB55367@shepherd> References: <48486F30.1000603@diamondbox.dk> <20080605234013.GB54936@atarininja.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080605234013.GB54936@atarininja.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Nikolaj Thygesen Subject: Re: Commiting new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "sahil@tandon.net" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:11:31 -0000 Wesley Shields wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I hope this is the right list to ask this question. I recently > > commited a new port, and received two messages from "ports." The first > > one noted that a person had assigned the port to himself, and the second > > mail simply stated that the PR went from "open" to "closed" due to > > "feedback timeout." I reckon this means the port was rejected, but have > > no clue for what reason. Was I supposed to supply any kind of feedback > > somewhere?? > > I would suggest following up with the person who closed the PR (which I > assume was the same person it was assigned to). There is a good chance > the feedback request was not seen by you for any number of reasons. > Lastly, the feedback being requested should also be in the audit-trail > of the PR if possible, so you may be able to look there if you have not > already. > > Without more information I'm afraid we can't help you further. We would > need, at a minimum, the PR number to follow up. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/123239 Perhaps Martin sought feedback from Nikolaj via email and did not receive a reply. -- Sahil Tandon