Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jan 2012 06:49:37 -0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
Cc:        freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: dev/etherswitch
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmo=qkA%2B%2B6=rbCEU6ydGTO9OcQMYU8hfj93popthH4pO6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E627B127-B74F-446C-995D-4524B14D02BA@lassitu.de>
References:  <C456CF98-0E0D-4563-8FDB-B77B8CF5B9E1@lassitu.de> <CAJ-VmomL=v00uEN62V8NSFEoD9LcUg1KVW38HrXxT-gXnZoO4g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonwDFJzReS%2BRE6umGK8XoFwPOt=FGFAyOhYtOvjzM7sCQ@mail.gmail.com> <091CDDB2-AF5D-4BD7-8AC2-EC0CC5A78E40@lassitu.de> <CAJ-VmonPTL9pwqk2O9brmz%2B66U8WCv2n0etZ1ncaCfUC6Z1z-g@mail.gmail.com> <E627B127-B74F-446C-995D-4524B14D02BA@lassitu.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 January 2012 06:45, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> wrote:

> Long term we'll want to revisit the gpio infrastructure to be able to mak=
e use of i.e. polarity of the pins etc., and a more sophisticated way to co=
nfigure these functions through hints. =A0I'd like to avoid adding another =
three or four bitmasks...

Well long term I think we shouldn't be using bitmasks, but should
configure each GPIO pin along with default values. But that can come
later.



Adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=qkA%2B%2B6=rbCEU6ydGTO9OcQMYU8hfj93popthH4pO6Aw>