From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 17:53:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E07016A4CE; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:53:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCBC43D49; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NinthNine) with SMTP id iASHrCrw028094; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:53:12 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:53:12 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200411281753.iASHrCrw028094@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20041128155724.GA62860@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200411272346.iARNkvDJ057170@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> <1101599981.60609.13.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20041128025700.GA61697@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041128104630.1f894b66@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20041128155724.GA62860@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.99-gtk2-20041024 (GTK+ 2.4.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.11 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:53:12 +0900 (JST) cc: itetcu@people.tecnik93.com cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: pav@FreeBSD.org cc: kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 4.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:53:14 -0000 On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 07:57:24 -0800 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > Generating INDEX - please wait.. Done. > > > > > make_index: dspam-3.2.2.20041117.1515: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/sqlite2 > > > > > make_index: dspam-3.2.2.20041117.1515: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/sqlite2 > > > > Fixed and sorry guys. > > > > Trivia question: why is sqlite2 disconnected from build? > > > Looks like a committer never completed a repo-copy. > > My apologies. I thought that after nork@'s heads-up on the 20th, he did > > update databases/sqlite to version 3 as he intended and I did the last > > minute change; I also and verified it with make describe and since I > > don't use `make index' on this machine I maneged to broke the INDEX. > > Any way I could have catch it ? > It's really the committer's responsibility, and there is a checklist > on performing repo-copies in the committer's guide. Sorry, I didn't recover sqlite related ports. ume made me notice that SQLite3 don't have SQLite2 compatibiliry API. SQLite3 is different from SQLite2. So I changed operation order at HEADS UP, I'll commit by following operation order. 1. Repocopy databases/sqlite to databases/sqlite3 net/gnunet will be broken (until databases/sqlite3 will be updated). 2. Update databases/sqlite3 to 3.0.5 net/gnunet will be unbroken, automatically. 3. Update databases/sqlite2 to 2.8.15. 4. Connect databases/sqlite2 to databases/Makefile 5. Chase *_DEPEND on databases/sqlite to databases/sqlite2, 6. Remove databases/sqlite 7. All ports which is depended on database/sqlite2 bump PORTREVISION. Maybe, I can atomically commit STEP.2-7. But I have no time to do this. To get minimum time BROKEN time of net/gnunet, I'll do above after 2004/Dec/10.