From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Jun 21 10: 4:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from tiku.hut.fi (tiku.hut.fi [130.233.228.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B5637B401 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:04:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sparvu@alpha.hut.fi) Received: from alpha.hut.fi (sparvu@alpha.hut.fi [130.233.224.50]) by tiku.hut.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA04906; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:04:07 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:04:06 +0300 (EET DST) From: Stefan Parvu To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates questions In-Reply-To: <20010621114210.T4543@sneakerz.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thank you all guys. I've got the picture. stefan On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:42:10 -0500 > From: Alfred Perlstein > To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav > Cc: Stefan Parvu , fs@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: softupdates questions > > * Dag-Erling Smorgrav [010621 05:34] wrote: > > Stefan Parvu writes: > > > > > 3. There is some concern about to integrate dirpref to FreeBSD . Why is > > > this ? Are any specific changes to fsck or other tools regarding dirpref ? > > > > It was integrated in early April. I can't remember there being any > > controversy over it. > > old fsck + new dirpref == spammed superblock, meaning that some fields > required by the new dirpref would be zero'd after fsck, this would > cause a divide by zero fault in the kernel. > > there was a patch added to recognize spammed dirpref values and > reinit them, so this is no longer a problem. > > -Alfred > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message