From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 12 9:29:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B868C37B404 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:29:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trangmoi.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4337643E42 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:29:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gACHTPXD060337; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:29:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gACHS1nK060320; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:28:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:28:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Mark Murray Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper Message-ID: <20021112172801.GA60237@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Mark Murray , current@FreeBSD.ORG, Kris Kennaway References: <20021112101236.GB8744@dragon.nuxi.com> <200211121234.gACCYNpD019022@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211121234.gACCYNpD019022@grimreaper.grondar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:34:23PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out > > for all the cases I hoped it would when I committed it. > > Yes, I think so. DES (The author?) doesn't mind. I'm for removal and so is > Kris. Why does DES have to be asked? I did the import. It does not matter where the code came from. Do I need to send out a **HEADS UP** to make it absolutely clear what is being proposed? Or can I move forward working on the theory that working nice for ports building is sufficient backing? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message