From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 9 20:48:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DE316A403 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:48:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrenalinup@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A66B43CAC for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adrenalinup@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1446747nfc for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:48:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JrvZIZNksAIaNU04fI4m/wkah4hh7efbT9IZfdAEk8aFcFSCwUzHNV8ndUYAjyKo1vDn7DZ4/l1h7DGP/VEszp/4AVO6+E6he/IKH/JcZbHMabkOLC2fJ1lljfQz3B62ZQP/E1krTtyeHOeFnQRJpjMXRf78OfRBvNe1kGi9gjQ= Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr96233buc.1165697300826; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.164.8 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:48:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:48:20 +0200 From: "Nicolae Namolovan" To: bu7cher@yandex.ru In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <457B1226.000010.23972@webmail11.yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ipfw] Dynamic rules grow indefinitely.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:48:24 -0000 Is there a big performance impact with net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_keepalive=0 ? On 12/9/06, Nicolae Namolovan wrote: > I have 6.1-RELEASE-p10, last addition to "UPDATING" file is 2006.09.30. > > Could updating to RELENG_6_2 fix that problem ? > > On 12/9/06, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > >Strange, why only me(?) get this problem.. Isn't > > >net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_keepalive=1 by default ? > > > > This is a workaround. I am aware about this problem from several people. > > Here is needed more testing to determine the cause of the bug. > > Do you have a lastest FreeBSD release? Bug is still present in RELENG_6 or RELENG_6_2? > > > > -- > > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Nicolae Namolovan. > -- Best regards, Nicolae Namolovan.