Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:35:06 +0100 From: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arflags cleanup Message-ID: <553C482F-9A67-4E60-9DBE-D5D6CA548D67@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <0693B91A-6320-4CE9-A6FA-821B290BB74C@bsdimp.com> References: <3D0FBCC4-743C-45B0-82E0-4C82501F7E60@cederstrand.dk> <A5F62693-7817-4A99-8D45-DC3CE1FAD83B@bsdimp.com> <E8A733AD-56DE-4FFA-8BA4-BE56D2052BDD@cederstrand.dk> <C331C11B-EC33-4E1E-9772-269077695334@cederstrand.dk> <0693B91A-6320-4CE9-A6FA-821B290BB74C@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner, Den 13/11/2012 kl. 03.26 skrev Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>: >>=20 >> If there are no other objections, I'll try to both patches into the = tree (I have no commit bit myself). >=20 > You haven't answered my objections, so not yet. I haven't had a = chance to see if this message actually answers my concerns though (my = life has been busy). As I understood your objections, you were worried about the negative = performance impact of loosing 'u', and the extra verbosity of loosing = 'c'. The first patch attempts to clean up ar flags, so makefiles respect the = global ARFLAGS if one is defined, without changing the default ARFLAGS = in share/mk/sys.mk. The second patch changes the default from 'rl' to = 'cru'. If this does not address your concerns, could you elaborate a bit more? Thanks, Erik=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?553C482F-9A67-4E60-9DBE-D5D6CA548D67>