From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun May 14 12:10:39 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA22465
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 12:10:39 -0700
Received: from haven.ios.com (haven.ios.com [198.4.75.45])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA22459
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 14 May 1995 12:10:37 -0700
Received: (from rashid@localhost) by haven.ios.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA05582 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 May 1995 15:13:07 -0400
From: "Rashid Karimov." <rashid@haven.ios.com>
Message-Id: <199505141913.PAA05582@haven.ios.com>
Subject: QUOTA's - is it broken ?  
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 15:13:06 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 536       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

		 Hi there ppl.


		Just to use a chance to get fix/reply before jkh
		will roll out 2.0.5 -any luck with QUOTAS ?

		I feel it's completely broken  - edquota/repquota/quota
		show very weird output.
		When I edit quotas for some user - and later do quota or
		edquota again - the soft limit value for blocks goes to hard one,
		the soft limit becomes zero.
		Quota reports absolutely absurd amount of blocks being used,
		while inode's quotas kinda work ...

		Does anyone here has QUOTAs working the way it should be ? 



		Rashid