From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Mar 16 20:39:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE8E37B718 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:39:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA06664 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:39:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.168.205] (cerberus [192.168.168.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2H4ehL03473 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:40:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010316094238T.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> References: <20010316094238T.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:22:35 -0800 To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG From: Rich Morin Subject: Re: test message (c) - please ignore Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 9:42 AM -0800 3/16/01, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >... You're also not supposed to send test messages to any of the >mailing lists - that's what test@freebsd.org is for. Imagine how >much the SNR would suffer if everybody used public distribution >lists for testing. Point taken. Now, wouldn't it be a Good Thing to say something about this on the appropriate web page, which I take to be: http://www.FreeBSD.org/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL I have scanned this document in some detail. AFAICT: "freebsd-test" is never mentioned, let alone explained. "freebsd-test-digest" is mentioned (once), but not explained. -r -- -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm email: rdm@cfcl.com phone: +1 650-873-7841 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message