From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 21 02:46:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5B41065694; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A11A8FC19; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8L2k9cB032127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:16:09 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:15:58 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4AB35086.90502@FreeBSD.org> <20090919.230053.58383965.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3766416.kTYsddXpYt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909211216.07249.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.622 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Rick Macklem , jhb@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, rmacklem@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: svn commit: r197298 - head/sbin/mount_nfs X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:46:21 -0000 --nextPart3766416.kTYsddXpYt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Rick Macklem wrote: > And what about going through NAT gateways? (I'm not familiar with how > typical NAT gateways are set up, but do they all forward UDP ok?) The thought of doing NFS over the internet boggles my mind :) However all consumer grade routers will NAT UDP properly otherwise=20 people wouldn't be able to play games. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart3766416.kTYsddXpYt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKtujv5ZPcIHs/zowRAjAQAKCJXeb6R5zCMsPYJ8G09ipGnGcqOgCeJTE2 /LKEWcGNk6n5aTYB+irrxXI= =uBHK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3766416.kTYsddXpYt--