From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 20 11:07:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375B9106564A; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milu@dat.pl) Received: from jab.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1E98FC0A; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jab.dat.pl (jsrv.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD7771; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:47:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl Received: from jab.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (jab.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cnQJuxPadavt; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:47:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from snifi.localnet (snifi.laptop [10.0.10.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5279F37; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:47:47 +0100 (CET) From: Maciej Milewski To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, "freebsd-current" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:48:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-ARCH; KDE/4.5.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201101201148.45476.milu@dat.pl> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:16:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Max Khon Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:07:32 -0000 Dnia czwartek, 20 stycznia 2011 o 10:44:27 Max Khon napisa=B3(a): > Adrian, >=20 > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Adrian Chadd > wrote: >=20 > I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the >=20 > > if_ath code into -HEAD. > >=20 > > I'd appreciate some testing just to ensure I haven't broken anything > > terribly obvious. >=20 > Any chances for proper support for Atheros 802.11n cards? > Should not we just port ath9k (Linux) or athn (OpenBSD) drivers? AFAIK OpenBSD support is limited on these cards. =46rom man athn(4)[1] CAVEATS The athn driver does not support any of the 802.11n capabilities offer= ed by the adapters. Additional work is required in ieee80211(9) before those features can be supported. [1] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi- bin/man.cgi?query=3Dathn&apropos=3D0&sektion=3D0&manpath=3DOpenBSD+Current&= arch=3Di386&format=3Dhtml Regards, Maciej Milewski