From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:29:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A8116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:29:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E8C43D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) id j05LQiOq048373 for current@freebsd.org.checked; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:26:44 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) with ESMTP id j05LPKTf048356; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:25:20 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <41DC5910.8030905@cronyx.ru> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:16:00 +0300 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426 X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <41DB08B9.6090801@savvis.net> <41DB1310.4060807@cronyx.ru> <41DB1700.7060708@savvis.net> <41DB1839.9080104@elischer.org> <41DC4FA2.8070609@savvis.net> <41DC5398.8020508@freebsd.org> <41DC5561.4090005@savvis.net> <41DC5690.3090205@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <41DC5690.3090205@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: netgraph(4) initialization order X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:29:57 -0000 Scott Long: > Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > >> Scott Long wrote: >> >>> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Hackers, >>>> >>>> any objections to the attached patch? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, as I stated in another email, I think that the core netgraph >>> module should be initialized before the SI_SUB_DRIVERS step. I >>> propose creating a new sysinit called SI_SUB_NETGRAPH with a value >>> of 0x30100000. That way it comes after SI_SUB_IF and before >>> SI_SUB_DRIVERS. This make fiddling with SI_ORDER_* unneccesary. >> >> >> how about new attached patch? >> >> thanks, >> max > > > Exactly what I had in mind =-) Have you tested this out to make sure > it fixes the problem cases? But this wouldn't save from the same problem it the future. rik > > > Scott > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"