Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:16:00 +0300 From: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: netgraph(4) initialization order Message-ID: <41DC5910.8030905@cronyx.ru> In-Reply-To: <41DC5690.3090205@freebsd.org> References: <41DB08B9.6090801@savvis.net> <41DB1310.4060807@cronyx.ru> <41DB1700.7060708@savvis.net> <41DB1839.9080104@elischer.org> <41DC4FA2.8070609@savvis.net> <41DC5398.8020508@freebsd.org> <41DC5561.4090005@savvis.net> <41DC5690.3090205@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long: > Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > >> Scott Long wrote: >> >>> Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Hackers, >>>> >>>> any objections to the attached patch? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, as I stated in another email, I think that the core netgraph >>> module should be initialized before the SI_SUB_DRIVERS step. I >>> propose creating a new sysinit called SI_SUB_NETGRAPH with a value >>> of 0x30100000. That way it comes after SI_SUB_IF and before >>> SI_SUB_DRIVERS. This make fiddling with SI_ORDER_* unneccesary. >> >> >> how about new attached patch? >> >> thanks, >> max > > > Exactly what I had in mind =-) Have you tested this out to make sure > it fixes the problem cases? But this wouldn't save from the same problem it the future. rik > > > Scott > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41DC5910.8030905>