From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 28 18:30:14 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814F016A423
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:30:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382FD43D48
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:30:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 4E9A82B22; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:30:13 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:30:13 -0500
To: Mark Kane <mark@mkproductions.org>
Message-ID: <20050928183013.GA18483@soaustin.net>
References: <433855C1.4060803@mkproductions.org>
	<433AC90D.80608@mkproductions.org>
	<20050928172829.GB5451@soaustin.net>
	<433ADE61.7030208@mkproductions.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <433ADE61.7030208@mkproductions.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade Error
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:30:14 -0000

On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:18:09PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> It worked with csh before...any reason it should not now?

I don't know, but from time to time we see reports of people that have
problems building ports under csh that disappear when sh is used.  The
test in bsd.python.mk that you were having problems with has been there
for quite some time, btw.

> Stupid question, but does this mean I'm good to continue with 
> portupgrade now? I see the warnings but it didn't say to run pkgdb -F or 
> anything.

In general running pkgdb should be safe.  AFAICT you should be good to
go now but Your Mileage May Vary.

mcl