From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 18 21:58:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: firewire@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D57B16A403 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC30C43D4C for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:58:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [172.21.130.86] (mx-broadway [38.98.68.18]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9ILw76Z027509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:58:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Bruce M Simpson Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:58:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200610181636.12516.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <45369D26.6060807@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: <45369D26.6060807@incunabulum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610181758.01905.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2041/Wed Oct 18 02:29:52 2006 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libraw1394 X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:58:09 -0000 середа 18 жовтень 2006 17:31, Bruce M Simpson написав: > From what I understand, Buzz's port does not deal with isochronous > streams. There is a rough mapping of Linux raw1394 APIs to > firewire(4)'s, based on code inspection, although they are not > documented in the FreeBSD man pages. BTW, we would, eventually, need to support Linux' ioctls as well, to allow Linux executables to access firewire directly. We already do this for some hardware (RAID storage-controllers, for example)... > > Thanks, I'm thinking about it too. My Makefile will be using bsd.lib.mk, > > of course :-) > That would reduce the chances of having the patches taken upstream given > the makefile churn. I'm willing to maintain our Makefile, if that means, the port can be built cleanly and without libtool. I don't think, we'll be bothering upstream with the patches to Makefile one way or the other :-) Thanks again to both of you! I look forward to the usable libraw1394... -mi