Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:58:01 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> Cc: firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libraw1394 Message-ID: <200610181758.01905.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <45369D26.6060807@incunabulum.net> References: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0610181257200.8352@tioga.arc.nasa.gov> <200610181636.12516.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <45369D26.6060807@incunabulum.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
середа 18 жовтень 2006 17:31, Bruce M Simpson написав: > From what I understand, Buzz's port does not deal with isochronous > streams. There is a rough mapping of Linux raw1394 APIs to > firewire(4)'s, based on code inspection, although they are not > documented in the FreeBSD man pages. BTW, we would, eventually, need to support Linux' ioctls as well, to allow Linux executables to access firewire directly. We already do this for some hardware (RAID storage-controllers, for example)... > > Thanks, I'm thinking about it too. My Makefile will be using bsd.lib.mk, > > of course :-) > That would reduce the chances of having the patches taken upstream given > the makefile churn. I'm willing to maintain our Makefile, if that means, the port can be built cleanly and without libtool. I don't think, we'll be bothering upstream with the patches to Makefile one way or the other :-) Thanks again to both of you! I look forward to the usable libraw1394... -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610181758.01905.mi%2Bmx>