From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 21:54:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B85A76 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cederstrand.dk) Received: from csmtp2.one.com (csmtp2.one.com [91.198.169.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8638FC13 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (unknown [176.222.238.90]) by csmtp2.one.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6B50A307C820; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 From: Erik Cederstrand In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:54:52 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1D1F9FB0-F0DE-4E8C-B07D-6C1D63E0F182@cederstrand.dk> References: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz> To: Mike Jakubik X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:54:59 -0000 Den 20/11/2012 kl. 22.03 skrev Mike Jakubik = : > On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: >>> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about = config, >>> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. = And they >>> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. >>=20 >> Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and >> Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. >>=20 >> Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. >>=20 >>> = http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html >>>=20 >>> Graphs are available as PDF attachments >>>=20 >>> = http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff8= 8/attachment-0002.pdf >>>=20 >>> = http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff8= 8/attachment-0003.pdf >=20 > These numbers show very significant improvements. Any = possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this too = much work? I know many have and still complain about our current = scheduler. According to the last PDF, the scheduler is only part of the picture. It = seems this email by Matt Dillon sums up the changes: = http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-September/017490.html Erik=