From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 29 13:40:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABC8153C8 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:40:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id NAA63981; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:40:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 13:40:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903292140.NAA63981@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: ports/10844: New port: adagdb Reply-To: Daniel Eischen Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/10844; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Eischen To: eischen@vigrid.com, sheldonh@iafrica.com Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/10844: New port: adagdb Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:33:53 -0500 (EST) > Remember that the 2.2 branch isn't a concern for ports anymore. If you > can keep a port working for that branch, great. But it shouldn't be your > development platform for submissions. YES, I know that. I did the port on a box that was -current as of last week. Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message