From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 17 06:40:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767251065670 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j@uriah.heep.sax.de) Received: from uriah.heep.sax.de (uriah.heep.sax.de [213.240.137.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257E38FC08 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by uriah.heep.sax.de (Postfix, from userid 107) id 24BE447; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:13:44 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E References: <4B53C4DA.9080008@langille.org> In-Reply-To: <4B53C4DA.9080008@langille.org> From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Original-Newsgroups: local.freebsd.scsi To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20100217061344.24BE447@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:13:44 +0100 (MET) Cc: Subject: Re: do I want ch0 or pass1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:40:54 -0000 Dan Langille wrote: > My understanding: chio(1) will with ch0, whereas mtx(1) will work > with pass1. Is this correct? Yes, it is. I've also got a changer device here, and it works fine with ch(4). -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)