From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 08:47:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7576516A4BF; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D69243FE3; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:47:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h98Fli7n001493; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:47:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031008115043.04df8c40@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:51:09 -0400 To: Murray Stokely , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20031008154503.GA10795@freebsdmall.com> References: <20031008154503.GA10795@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9 RC2 now available X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:47:46 -0000 Hi, does this image include the commits from nectar@freebsd.org for the PSE fix ? ---Mike At 11:45 AM 08/10/2003, Murray Stokely wrote: >We have resolved many of the issues brought up with the first release >candidate and made another ISO available for testing. We're >especially interested in hearing from people who can deploy this on >heavily loaded systems. > >ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.9-RC2 >ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/4.9-RC2-i386-disc1.iso > >Also, please test your favorite packages on the ISO image so we can be >sure our important third party applications are working properly. > > Thanks, > - Murray