From owner-cvs-lib  Fri Sep 27 09:49:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-lib
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA08146
          for cvs-lib-outgoing; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA08084;
          Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.7.6/8.6.9) id CAA30883; Sat, 28 Sep 1996 02:48:04 +1000
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 02:48:04 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199609271648.CAA30883@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM, phk@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib atexit.c src/lib/libc/sys brk.2
Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>   Modified:    lib/libc/stdlib  atexit.c
>>                lib/libc/sys  brk.2
>>   Log:
>>   Don't use malloc, pessimize to use sbrk.
>>   fix sbrk manpage while we're at it.
>
>Umm, you can't do this!  If you use sbrk(), you are preventing the future 
>use of malloc(), as you *cannot* intermix the use of sbrk() and malloc() 
>in the same program!

The author of malloc can intermix them :-).  Are there problems with old
versions?

Bruce