From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 17:10:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2041065689 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB0C8FC13 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so25193500iad.13 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:10:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KfBM+809vTeZAOZOuVnE9YpKANreqltyYMifgzqp8Ps=; b=lEB9iS9fEfYticmXx4wYX3W4SxoQzmwGsdzpanip5eib8aOZ2dg3hIVMv8WKd1lJ6D DXhimLGwRtT0mQI9mC6oLgRV97h+3mcEaF1jxwAhJY4WGF+gB7GrZeuVSy2HeXG9ne3V xziOblRcHtwaljGJqhEtdsQxg1G/sh87EBhIs= Received: by 10.43.51.69 with SMTP id vh5mr33743787icb.32.1325005801554; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:10:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:09:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EF9F945.4070804@missouri.edu> References: <201112271641.pBRGfVWh009645@fire.js.berklix.net> <4EF9F945.4070804@missouri.edu> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:09:30 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: klb-mgjxiFqGi07UWGReSeAR7r4 Message-ID: To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" , "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Re: svn-cur X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:10:02 -0000 On 27 December 2011 16:58, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 12/27/2011 10:41 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Chris Rees wrote: > > >>> Stephen is pointing out that src-9.0001 is not an incremental delta; >>> there's no src-9.0000. >>> >>> Yes, when it gets to src-9.0100 there'll be an Empty file here, >> >> >> Ah good, Thanks. >> >>> but >>> since there's no difference between 0001 and 0001Empty, there's no >>> point in having both files there. >> >> >> OK. >> I'd suggest it's better to rename them with string Empty for consistency= ? > > > When I modify or take over someone elses code, I try to follow their styl= e, > even if this leads to slight inconsistencies. =A0The original writer of t= he > script mkCTM must have intended for the first delta to be called xxx.0001= . > =A0There is a flag in the script called "CTMfirst." Setting this to "1" c= auses > the script to generate xxx.0001 by comparing it to an empty directory. > > This makes it very easy for me to start a new ctm series of deltas. =A0I = set > this flag to "1," run the mkCTM script, then set this flag back to "0," a= nd > then sit back and hope the whole thing works. > > It probably wouldn't be terribly hard for me to make slight modifications= to > mkCTM to rename it to .0001xEmpty. =A0But I prefer to stick to the origin= al > design as much as possible. > > > > Another subject - I have asked for the creation of the mailing lists. But > portmaster@freebsd.org bounced. I'm not surprised. It's postmaster@ ;) Chris