From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  5 15:44:49 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E1B16A543
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Jul 2006 15:44:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from arr@watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DC243DE4
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Jul 2006 15:44:04 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from arr@watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k65Fh9t5039978;
	Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:43:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (arr@localhost)
	by fledge.watson.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id
	k65Fh4B8039971; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:43:04 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from arr@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: arr owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:43:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060705.091556.513891519.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20060705114233.G38456@fledge.watson.org>
References: <20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org>
	<28872.1151526546@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<20060705.091556.513891519.imp@bsdimp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, phk@phk.freebsd.dk, yar@comp.chem.msu.su
Subject: Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:44:49 -0000

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:

:In message: <28872.1151526546@critter.freebsd.dk>
:            "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
:: In message <20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org>, "Andrew R. Reiter" writes
:: :
:: >
:: >I apologize for top posting, but I lost the email that I think my 
:: >point/question pertains to.
:: >
:: >Part of this seems to be for compatibility / merging from drivers of other 
:: >OSes, no?  If I am wrong, ignore me :-).  If this is the case, would it be 
:: >better to create some common other area for things of this nature so that 
:: >it suffices to allow builds, but does not infect other areas of our own 
:: >code base?
:: 
:: That's what I proposed too:  #include <sys/netbsd_compat.h>
:
:This is even lamer.  It makes no sense to invent a stupid place for a
:compatibility define.  Might as well put the definition of NULL in
:limits.h.
:
:I'm killing this idea because people hate it.

Please explain which "idea" you're killing ... because your post-July 4th 
attitude does not make it clear.

THANKS!


:
:Warner
:
:

--
arr@watson.org