From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 18 20:42:32 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1961065684
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd06+XA=646d3203@mlists.homeunix.com)
Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DED58FC0A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd06+XA=646d3203@mlists.homeunix.com)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046FD23E498
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:42:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:42:26 +0100
From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20080618214226.470453ef@gumby.homeunix.com.>
In-Reply-To: <20080618190621.GA49597@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
References: <20080618190621.GA49597@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Standardize NO_CCACHE flag and ccache definitions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:42:32 -0000

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:06:21 +0300
Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> wrote:

> In typical case check for size and mtime is enough.

It's not really a question of good enough, if you use  the mtime of
the driver on all builds, then *every* time you rebuild the compiler,
you invaldate all the cache objects that have been built with it. That
can have a major impact on port building, and it's in things
like "portupgrade -rf gettext" where ccache is most significant. Using
the hash avoids that problem.