From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 02:26:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9433616A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 02:26:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DB043D2F for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 02:26:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i02AQlu05766; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 02:26:48 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Rishi Chopra , questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 02:26:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <3FF53C3A.1000209@cal.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <3FF53C3A.1000209@cal.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401020226.43365.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: 'Portsdb -Uu' Fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:26:55 -0000 On Friday 02 January 2004 01:39 am, Rishi Chopra wrote: > I'm attempting my first 'portsdb -Uu' after a successful CVSUp, but > am running into some problems: > > idfubar# portsdb -Uu > Updating the ports index ... perl: not found > /usr/local/sbin/make_describe_pass2:70:in `write': Broken pipe > (Errno::EPIPE) > from /usr/local/sbin/make_describe_pass2:70:in `puts' > from /usr/local/sbin/make_describe_pass2:70 > failed to generate INDEX! > portsdb: index generation error > > Where have I failed? > You may not have. Sometimes people update the ports and leave things out. If you have done a recent cvsup of ports-all, try the following. cd /usr/ports make index portsdb -u There are times when portsdb has problems and there are times when "make index" falls on its face. I had a good "make index" at 0000 UTC. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html