From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 10 20:49:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA23546 for current-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 20:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vinyl.quickweb.com (vinyl.quickweb.com [206.222.77.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA23540 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 20:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mark@localhost) by vinyl.quickweb.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) id XAA25228; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 23:43:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19970410234347.04317@vinyl.quickweb.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 23:43:47 -0400 From: Mark Mayo To: Brian Tao Cc: Tom Bartol , FREEBSD-CURRENT-L Subject: Re: XFree86 3.2 causes constant 1.0 load average? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.66e In-Reply-To: ; from Brian Tao on Wed, Apr 09, 1997 at 01:47:57PM -0400 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, Apr 09, 1997 at 01:47:57PM -0400, Brian Tao wrote: > On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Tom Bartol wrote: > > > > I am running FreeBSD-3.0-970209-SNAP and AfterStep-1.0pre6 also and > > I too occasionally see this same thing (this morning, in fact). I > > have not been able to track it down. > > What X server are you using? Mach64? I also see this bogus load crap using Afterstep - but under Xinside's matrox Millenium server... Again, it seems random when the load will rise.. I've had this behaviour with Afterstep since version 1.0pre2, and since the 2.2 October SNAP up to 2.2.1R right now. > -- > Brian Tao (BT300, taob@netcom.ca) > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Mayo mark@quickweb.com RingZero Comp. http://vinyl.quickweb.com/mark finger mark@quickweb.com for my PGP key and GCS code ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- University degrees are a bit like adultery: you may not want to get involved with that sort of thing, but you don't want to be thought incapable. -Sir Peter Imbert