Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 08:17:50 -0600 From: "Justin L. Boss" <jlboss@yahoo.com> To: Cliff Sarginson <csfbsd@raggedclown.net>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: defragment UFS Message-ID: <20020303015350.B3B7337B400@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20020302111327.GC2634@raggedclown.net> References: <002301c1c1a6$b9e06f70$0801a8c0@ethel> <3C807C59.2050607@customfilmeffects.com> <20020302111327.GC2634@raggedclown.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
this is a samba bug that is supposed to be fixed in samba 2.2.3a (http://us1.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-2.2.3a.html) i'm not sure if it is or not, just getting ready to upgrade myself. also if you turn on soft updates it will defrag no the fly. i'm not sure but i do think a UFS does become fragmented because at boot time after mounting takes place you will see a line saying 3.8 % fragmented or what ever, also that is one of the claims of soft updates, that it defrags on the fly. hope this helps. out! On Saturday 02 March 2002 05:13 am, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 11:16:41PM -0800, David Smithson wrote: > > I forgot to mention that properties view is from a Windows 2000 machine. > > I'm sleepy. > > > > >When I view the properties of a SAMBA shared folder, there are two > > >file sizes shown: "size" and "size on disk". The "size on disk" is > > >consitently greater than the "size". I ignorantly assumed this meant > > >that data was fragmented. Do you have any idea what this means? > > No, that is outside my realm of knowledge I am afraid, perhaps someone > else maybe able to answer it. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020303015350.B3B7337B400>