From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Apr 21 15:36:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from vienna9.his.com (vienna9.his.com [216.200.68.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0976D37B41D; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.38] (root@[127.0.0.1]) by vienna9.his.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g3LMYek01344; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bs663385@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20020421214219.GA4662@lpt.ens.fr> References: <20020418110814.A64286@lpt.ens.fr> <20020418053829.X96787-100000@pogo.caustic.org> <20020419080009.L30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20020421214219.GA4662@lpt.ens.fr> X-Grok: +++ath X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black Reply-By: Wed, 1 Jan 1984 12:34:56 +0100 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Outlook will expire in 3 days. Please contact Microsoft about purchasing a new license. Remember: software piracy is a felony! Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:33:54 +0200 To: Rahul Siddharthan , Nik Clayton From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: overclocking and freebsd Cc: "f.johan.beisser" , Mike Meyer , Giorgos Keramidas , Bob Bomar , chat@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 11:42 PM +0200 2002/04/21, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > Ideally there would be another hotkey combination to cycle through > windows related to the application. But cycling in a fixed sequence > rather than using a "stack" -- *that* is a pain in the butt. So, - would always pop the stack? And this stack-popping is started all over again whenever any keyboard or mouse events are passed through to the application below? Hmmm... Interesting concept. But what happens if the mouse is accidentally moved while popping the stack? > How customizable is OS X? Suppose I don't like the aqua interface, > can I elect to run rootless X with my favourite window manager, not > have aqua at all, but still have access to OS X applications when I > want (start them up via the command line, or something)? Hmm. I don't know that this is possible. I've never tried it, though. I believe that you should be able to run an Aqua-less X-only environment, but then that would mean you couldn't run virtually all MacOS/Aqua applications, because they don't understand X. You would basically be turning your machine into a Unix box, just like installing any other form of Linux or *BSD on your machine and running *nix applications. -- Brad Knowles, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message