From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan  4 20:45:38 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id UAA19688 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Jan 1995 20:45:38 -0800
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA19682 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 1995 20:45:31 -0800
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id PAA12364; Thu, 5 Jan 1995 15:43:47 +1100
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 1995 15:43:47 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199501050443.PAA12364@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: Never mind on the "mcopy busy"
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, j@uriah.sax.de
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>> `struct flock' starts with an off_t, so the struct is totally
>> incompatible with the 1.1.5 version.

>But...  Didn't the old version of flock() use a different syscall
>number?  We should still be able to deal with the 32 bit off_t in
>the old syscall..

No, there is only one flock.  Fixing this would break the 2.0 flock :-[.

Bruce