From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 13 20:25:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3CBC4E for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F831126 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r5DKPn15004592; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:25:49 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 kib.kiev.ua r5DKPn15004592 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r5DKPnGJ004591; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:25:49 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:25:49 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Peter Olsson Subject: Re: Does quota still require a custom kernel in FreeBSD 9? Message-ID: <20130613202549.GE91021@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20130613194415.GA63887@pol-server.leissner.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MIdTMoZhcV1D07fI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130613194415.GA63887@pol-server.leissner.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tom.home Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:25:52 -0000 --MIdTMoZhcV1D07fI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 09:44:15PM +0200, Peter Olsson wrote: > Just wondering if a custom kernel with options QUOTA > is still needed in FreeBSD 9. I have no test server > available right now to test this. >=20 > According to the handbook it is needed, but I found > in a post from 2011 that it would be entered into > GENERIC, so the handbook statement might be old? >=20 > My reason for asking is that I'm about to convert > from source build to freebsd-update in all servers, > so I would like to revert to GENERIC wherever possible. >=20 > (If it is still needed, are there any plans for > removing this need?) Option QUOTA is present in the GENERIC kernels on HEAD and stable/9. I doubt that there is a release where the option is turned on, i.e. 9.1 kernels most likely do not have QUOTA. --MIdTMoZhcV1D07fI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRuirNAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1BrjQP/jKXqi0TroPeSpUMyw9b9upJ 2uwVPH++lug2lQt7r0UwYBK7W7cslz0pN3Ng3IyyXHBX5ulEjSOQz5/5URqP/b+2 S/m/TVNSKsGHBcZtxTquiiT24QLqunHRAaP2I6lVaP91pZhgBnXn5Z96dcFlxdyc WtdsrtQu0LM+MI31FsPqA7CR05yqgqGcizEOMotmB3lZVYgp2+Z3eCjeExaMXDwU 3CNCM2k8/AwG7eU+TpbhrE21RnWbCwqunb0XHrdAoZ1DT7lDI2g8DCOjbk7TtYoG lSAntfenGCPsYHsl/2vpAbHx2usnVKTvjwyZZWwo4vlhvKspw2/ldHh3MjsNnXVD Yfx4KIVLb9h7Zk2NNzEz5rTDI9sioM21T3+ww5JLMw2CAfZvOAbkaGdTfgL2O2pV 8ryhce8NHJ1SaMDixJ1tJY3KUiSJYxNYIAZagtqWEX7jHwbqavPFPGGqjUBw3ciV XdhqwlnD86s6/zzGeVlowFqYMCtA/uiKqoK26j1oZKTRTIp95ideyIJqDQVKkh/X Hr+THN2qTj80fL5FniQrJUrCwf1IJ2ttiR+2Od0DpxxM3+wJbT74JHuM7zxnmQne XmpTkrHgfLjQ54Y0/eM6PswpuLmM/OUupLuA7AagDJAzsgB/zrruJnxFk9t6PbcW 71l0owLy9zDNHjBqpOLX =RUmq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MIdTMoZhcV1D07fI--