From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 30 11:40:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BEF37B403 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA31997; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:20:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:20:11 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Brad Huntting Cc: Peter Wemm , Bruce Evans , Garance A Drosihn , Nate Williams , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. In-Reply-To: <200110301833.f9UIXMZ41710@hunkular.glarp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG can you give an example? On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Brad Huntting wrote: > > > I see not reason that the timestamps should be signed.. > > Arithmatic on timestamps will break if time_t is changed to unsigned. > > > brad > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message