From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 2 01:40:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA13384 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 01:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usr08.primenet.com (tlambert@usr08.primenet.com [206.165.6.208]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA13374 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 01:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA24994; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 01:40:05 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199710020840.BAA24994@usr08.primenet.com> Subject: Re: r-cmds and DNS and /etc/host.conf To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:40:04 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <19971002082913.AL43712@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Oct 2, 97 08:29:13 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Could that be the problem? > > Yes. I wouldn't be surprised if one of the clients were asking for > localhost.vnet.net. In my case, it's the fully qualified host name. As I said before, how the hell does it know to qualify the host name when it reads /etc/host.conf and doesn't read /etc/resolv.conf to determine the domain name until the /etc/hosts reverse lookup fails? The /etc/hosts lookup should not be qualified, nor should it fail... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.