From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 20:38:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDA616A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:38:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Thomas.Wintergerst@nord-com.net) Received: from mail5.ewetel.de (mail5.ewetel.de [212.6.122.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0394243D1F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:38:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Thomas.Wintergerst@nord-com.net) Received: from kalak.lemur.nord.de (dialin-80-228-50-139.ewe-ip-backbone.de [80.228.50.139]) by mail5.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j52KcVCs008137; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:38:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (lullog.lemur.nord.de [192.168.2.4]) by kalak.lemur.nord.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j52KKIGG000664; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:20:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Thomas.Wintergerst@nord-com.net) Message-ID: <429F6A02.5010302@nord-com.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 22:20:18 +0200 From: Thomas Wintergerst User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041220) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <58763.1116954884@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <58763.1116954884@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CheckCompat: OK Cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org, asterisk-users@lists.digium.com, Asterisk on BSD discussion Subject: Re: Asterisk on FreeBSD + Passive ISDN BRI X-BeenThere: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: twinterg@gmx.de List-Id: Using ISDN with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:38:42 -0000 Hi, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <95321E77-C79C-4BB7-9E5B-739849F6C365@cian.ws>, Cian Hughes writes: > > >>Ok, from what I can see _NO_ passive ISDN cards will work with >>Asterisk on freebsd, is this correct & is it likely to change soon? > > > We talked about the future prospects for I4B at the developer summit > at BSDcan, and the conclusion was that it would be great if it got > a new lease on life through Asterix, but nobody signed up for > doing it. > Maybe one should think of doing this over CAPI (and c4b, of course). This would "only" need a driver for passive ISDN boards. If someone could rewrite the existing D-channel stack, I could come up with a CAPI driver layer on top of it. Sure, the interface must still be defined. And as you and Hellmuth mentioned, one would need a volunteer... -- Regards, Thomas