From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org  Thu Jun 25 00:04:08 2020
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D52346FC7;
 Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49sgGw1kvgz4GGV;
 Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B23DF1265C;
 Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:04:05 +0000
From: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>
To: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>
Cc: ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r540354 - head/security/vuxml
Message-ID: <20200625000405.GX61041@FreeBSD.org>
References: <202006242153.05OLrxWT076793@repo.freebsd.org>
 <CACNAnaGknZABPB36+=zJx+L18R9uyRcrYjQGXouZJcVW5ZRAHA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KG+zyBxh8BrwB1om"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaGknZABPB36+=zJx+L18R9uyRcrYjQGXouZJcVW5ZRAHA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:04:08 -0000


--KG+zyBxh8BrwB1om
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 05:54:35PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:54 PM Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > Author: gjb
> > Date: Wed Jun 24 21:53:58 2020
> > New Revision: 540354
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/540354
> >
> > Log:
> >   Fix build, again...
> >
> >   Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC (netgate.com)
> >
> > Modified:
> >   head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
> >
> > Modified: head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > --- head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml        Wed Jun 24 21:37:05 2020       =
 (r540353)
> > +++ head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml        Wed Jun 24 21:53:58 2020       =
 (r540354)
> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Notes:
> >        </body>
> >      </description>
> >      <references>
> > -      <cvename>CE-2020-6509</cvename>
> > +      <cvename>CVE-2020-6509</cvename>
> >        <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2020/06/stable-channe=
l-update-for-desktop_22.html</url>
> >      </references>
> >      <dates>
>=20
> Alright, this one has me convinced that `make validate` should really
> check the contents of <cvename>... anyone else already working on
> that?
>=20

No idea, but I think it is a fair assumption to state that the
'validate' target, generally, does not work(tm).

Glen


--KG+zyBxh8BrwB1om
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=9VZO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KG+zyBxh8BrwB1om--