Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Mar 1997 14:14:17 -0800
From:      Erich Boleyn <erich@uruk.org>
To:        Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
Cc:        freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: P6 MB recommendations 
Message-ID:  <E0w2Owz-0003Zd-00@uruk.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Mar 1997 12:36:47 MST." <199703051936.MAA05910@clem.systemsix.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> wrote:

> be aware that there is an outside chance that a CPU purchased 6 months from
> now may not be able to run with a current stepping.  Intel says that you
> should always run dual CPUs of the same stepping.  this used to be a 
> requirement because of differences ion timings of the APICs and ???
> It is my personnal understanding that it is no longer a problem, but
> you should understand that there is a slight chance of incompatibility...

As I understand it, the problems were with the Pentium dual-CPU
configurations, which had a bunch of incompatible fixes to the APIC
logic over it's lifetime.  The later ones are pretty worry-free.

The Pentium Pro setups were designed and tested up to 4-CPU early on,
and the protocol was stabilized pretty well.

Ideally, 2 CPUs of the same stepping is good, but I'm not sure it
matters that much as long as they're of the same model for the
Pentium Pro.  However, I don't think the next revision of the Pentium
Pro (the one with MMX) is supposed to be pinout-compatible.  The existing
version will probably continue to be available.  Check with Intel for
details.

--
  Erich Stefan Boleyn                 \_ E-mail (preferred):  <erich@uruk.org>
Mad Genius wanna-be, CyberMuffin        \__      (finger me for other stats)
Web:  http://www.uruk.org/~erich/     Motto: "I'll live forever or die trying"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0w2Owz-0003Zd-00>