From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Sep 22 08:02:22 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA06024
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 08:02:22 -0700
Received: from irbs.irbs.com (irbs.com [199.182.75.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA06016
          for <freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 08:02:14 -0700
Received: (from jc@localhost) by irbs.irbs.com (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA02965 for freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 11:02:04 -0400
From: John Capo <jc@irbs.com>
Message-Id: <199509221502.LAA02965@irbs.irbs.com>
Subject: Re: sig 10/11 problems
To: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org (freebsd-current)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 11:02:02 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <9509221242.AA04947@borg.ess.harris.com> from "James Leppek" at Sep 22, 95 08:42:16 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 629       
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

James Leppek writes:
> 
> I have been testing a patch from david since yesterday morning 
> (compiles, make world, etc) and I have not seen the problem so 
> the patch is either working or has moved the problem :-)
> 
> Sorry it took a while to test but I wanted to try 2 make worlds at 
> 7 hours each.
> 
> It may help if people with 16Meg machines try it because I noticed
> that the problem was more frequent with 16M than 32M.
> 

I have been running one heavily loaded 16M machine for an hour with
no problems.  Innd, 2 makes, X, NFS server.  It wouldn't make it an
hour with previous kernels.

John Capo
IRBS Engineering