Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:46:02 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> To: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, "Koster K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: audiofs mixing audio and data tracks Message-ID: <20000810124602.L1050@pavilion.net> In-Reply-To: <200008100927.LAA28154@freebsd.dk>; from sos@freebsd.dk on Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:27:56AM %2B0200 References: <20000810090255.F468@hand.dotat.at> <200008100927.LAA28154@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:27:56AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Tony Finch wrote: > > Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> wrote: > > >It seems Koster, K.J. wrote: > > >> > > >> Am I right in thinking that a cdrom can have at most one data track? In that > > >> case, I'd suggest assighing that track a standard device node. That way I > > >> could just mount the data track of a cdrom, without worrying if that's track > > >> 4 or track 1. > > > > > >Mostly yes, but there is nothing hindering multiple data tracks on > > >the same CD. At any rate we only have access to one now anyways so > > >that wouldn't hurt anything :) > > > > How does this relate to multi-session CDs? Does that happen at a lower layer? > > Same thing, we always uses the last session written (which can > include parts from earlier written sessions), so the first track > on the last session will be the default track you get on /dev/acdN[ac] > just as it is now. Am I correct in thinking that the meta data in later sessions can point to data block in the earlier sessions? Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000810124602.L1050>