From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 20:01:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3457E1065672; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 20:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87188FC16; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 20:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9BB14E621B; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:01:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id piKkwyMs3AKL; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:01:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (catv-80-98-232-12.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.232.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD27714E61E8; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:01:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E91FD81.8010009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:01:05 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0a1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/10.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Fonvieille References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <4E8F0AA2.3020704@freebsd.org> <4E8F8873.4030006@FreeBSD.org> <20111008090351.GA1960@emphyrio.blackend.org> <4E91A867.9060905@FreeBSD.org> <20111009153343.GC2006@emphyrio.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <20111009153343.GC2006@emphyrio.blackend.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Doug Barton , doc@FreeBSD.org, doceng@FreeBSD.org, Gavin Atkinson , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= , Rene Ladan Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:01:11 -0000 On 2011.10.09. 17:33, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> On 2011.10.08. 11:03, Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>> And before doing the change, some things should >>> be done: complete separation between release docs and doc/ >> Or maybe complete integration? Once we are in SVN we can branch release >> docs even if we do not branch the rest to make it easy for translators. >> What do you think? >> > It's obvious that your point of view can also be defended, but the aim > from src point of view is to be able to build a release without the need > of a doc tree. Yes, I meant moving the release docs entirely to the doc repo. As far as I know, the main reason it is in src is that the src repo has had different release branches and the doc repo has been unbranched. If we go to SVN, we could branch at least the release docs there and it would not be necessary any more to keep the release docs in the src repo. That solves all issues that I'm aware of, i.e. branching, building releases without a doc tree, avoid scattering infrastructure code. Do we need anything else? Gabor