From owner-freebsd-hubs Thu Feb 20 16:39:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA20011 for hubs-outgoing; Thu, 20 Feb 1997 16:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA19987 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 1997 16:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA12325; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 11:45:19 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 11:45:18 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org cc: ajh@truck.its.unimelb.edu.au Subject: Comments on location of des directory. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hubs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, Last night I fetched the 2.1.7-RELEASE from wcarchive, and I forgot about excluding the des directory until after the event. The packages directory is really a symlink to ../packages-2.1.6, and I was wondering if there might be a case for making the des directory similar. I proposed having 2.1.7-RELEASE/des a symlink for des/2.1.7-RELEASE to Jordan. His response was that most mirrors and users are US based, and the onus is on the rest of the world to remember to do the right thing. This is fine, except when, like me last night, the admin forgets. Is there any support from non-US mirrors for changing the structure? Is there much resistance from US-mirrors to having to do an additional mirror of the des directory, bringing them into line with non-US mirrors who currently exclude 2.1.7-RELEASE/des from the primary mirror session, and fetch it from ftp.internat.freebsd.org? Thanks for your comments, Daniel O'Callaghan