From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 31 03:16:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA24034 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 03:16:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA24028 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 03:16:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au) Message-Id: <199808311016.DAA24028@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA253598523; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:15:23 +1000 From: Darren Reed Subject: TCP performance. To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:15:23 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, FreeBSD TCP performance sucks or it does some things which can make it suck badly. >From simple observations (hub leds, ftp's meter), ftp'ing from a laptop (3c589d) running 2.2.6 to SunOS4 (LX) is considerably worse than in the other direction. Although I do suspect the 3c589d (or its driver - zp ?) do not handle ethernet collisions at all in a good way to be a possible cause. I've never known ethernet ftp performance so bad as with the equipment just mentioned. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message