Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1995 17:24:36 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Faried Nawaz <fn@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>, jis@mit.edu Cc: security@FreeBSD.org Subject: legal to export DES outside of the US via Canada? Message-ID: <199512090124.RAA15606@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Dec 1995 14:27:04 PST." <199512082227.OAA00937@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an amazing loophole if it is true, but like the old saying goes,
it sounds too good to be true. All it would take would be two coopoerating
parties to legally export (non-patented) non-commercial crypto code.
If this is true, I wonder why MIT's crowd of friends didn't pick up on it
with respect to Kerberos (which sounds like it meets all criteria)?
Paul
From: Faried Nawaz <fn@pain.csrv.uidaho.edu>
mmm...canada.
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: xmisc-request@zephyr.ccrc.wustl.edu
Received: from zephyr.ccrc.wustl.edu (zephyr.ccrc.wustl.edu [128.252.169.9])
>>by pain.csrv.uidaho.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA00348 for <fn@pain.csr
>>v.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 13:53:43 -0800
Received: from zephyr.ccrc.wustl.edu by zephyr.ccrc.wustl.edu id aa02678;
8 Dec 95 13:08 CST
Received: from MAJORDOMO by zephyr.ccrc.wustl.edu id aa02675; 8 Dec 95 13:05
>>CST
Received: from zeus.theos.com by zephyr.ccrc.wustl.edu id aa02666;
8 Dec 95 13:05 CST
Received: from LOCALHOST.theos.com by theos.com (4.1/tdr1.0)
id AA10446; Fri, 8 Dec 95 12:05:23 MST
Message-Id: <9512081905.AA10446@theos.com>
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: crypto software export
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1995 12:05:22 -0700
From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com>
Sender: owner-misc@openbsd.org
Precedence: bulk
I just got confirmation from the Canadian government that free
software is not controlled by any cryptographic export or usage laws
in Canada.
Yes, this means we're free to include any and all cryptographic stuff
that we want in any place in the source tree, as long as licensing,
patent, etc. issues are handled.
The actual text of the law is being mailed to me. I'll be able to
quote from it later if anyone wants further details.
BTW, in a twist of law, when I asked about ITAR the gentleman said
that ITAR doesn't enter into the picture at all. Apparently one could
bring ITAR code into Canada, and the Canadian government has no law on
the books to prevent it from being re-exported to the world. I'd
always suspected this loophole; the fellow picked up rather quickly on
what I was suggesting..... and made it clear that there'd be no law
to prevent one from doing so! (not that I want to re-export ITAR)
------- End of Forwarded Message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512090124.RAA15606>