From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 23 15:55:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA22132 for current-outgoing; Fri, 23 May 1997 15:55:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA22127 for ; Fri, 23 May 1997 15:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id AAA29205 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 24 May 1997 00:55:27 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA26106; Sat, 24 May 1997 00:34:41 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19970524003440.QC44104@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 00:34:40 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cd9660 w/ Joliet extensions References: <19970523224300.LX25394@uriah.heep.sax.de> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: ; from Ian Struble on May 23, 1997 14:08:23 -0700 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Ian Struble wrote: > >I would prefer mickeysoft using RR. :-] > > Me too. I was just reading about Joliet and wondering why they didn't. I > guess it is just the usual 'not invented here syndrome'... Also my guess. Or simply ignorance: ``Oh, there is already a standard for long filenames? But how could this be, since they have only been introduced into the world by Windows[TM] NT and Windows[TM] 95.'' TM == trashmark, of course. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)