From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed May 19 14:55:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (unknown [209.198.197.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C039214FA5 for ; Wed, 19 May 1999 14:55:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obonilla@voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu) Received: (from obonilla@localhost) by voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA00775; Wed, 19 May 1999 15:54:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from obonilla) Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 15:54:52 -0600 From: Oscar Bonilla To: Sam Stephenson Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux.com misconceptions Message-ID: <19990519155452.A344@fisicc-ufm.edu> References: <99051916483400.07598@thanatos.conio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <99051916483400.07598@thanatos.conio.net>; from Sam Stephenson on Wed, May 19, 1999 at 04:45:28PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 04:45:28PM -0400, Sam Stephenson wrote: > Anyone care to comment on the blatant misinformation here? > http://linux.com/linux@work/oscomp.phtml#l17 > Linux.com hasn't been up for 24 hours yet, and they're > already lying about BSD. > > The most obvious distortions are: > - Scalability: BSD is listed as "Small to Large," while > Linux is listed as "Small to Huge." > - Multi-Platform: No BSD runs only on one platform. > I think there are far mor obvious misconceptions. They have UNIX whith excellent connectivity (as well as linux) but *BSD only has good conectivity? Windows 96 SMB Only? I'm pretty sure they ship tcp/ip, ipx, etc. regards, -Oscar -- For PGP Public Key: finger obonilla@fisicc-ufm.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message