From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 10:37:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E1E16A417; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@petri.cc) Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [129.142.64.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E37213C459; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@petri.cc) Received: from localhost (unknown [129.142.64.64]) by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC057CB670; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:36:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at catpipe.net Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([129.142.64.64]) by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [129.142.64.64]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FP6TWSlazeDu; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fever.catpipe.net (0x57351859.vgnxx8.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [87.53.24.89]) (Authenticated sender: relayuser) by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5C57CB61C; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:36:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46A484CA.8030805@petri.cc> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:36:58 +0200 From: "Nicolai Petri (lists)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070527) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Leffler References: <20070619011908.GA53748@heff.fud.org.nz> <20070620042023.GA17424@nowhere> <4678B1E4.7080909@errno.com> <467ED084.4000002@petri.cc> In-Reply-To: <467ED084.4000002@petri.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Craig Boston , FreeBSD Current , Andrew Thompson Subject: Re: wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:37:02 -0000 Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote: > >>> In short, ipw doesn't seem to work at all for me anymore. It worked >>> okay in 6-stable with an occasional hiccup, but upon upgrading to >>> current it doesn't seem to be doing anything. >>> Sometimes "ifconfig scan" does nothing, sometimes it results in a panic. >> >> I'm not sure how well ipw got tested while the changes were in p4. >> We'll need to test again now that code has been merged to CVS. I'll try >> to look at this weekend if noone else beats me to it. >> >> Sam > > > I'm running -current from following time : Thu Jun 20 > > Best regards, > Nicolai Petri > Are there any news on this matter ? We are now 1 month closer to beta and ipw is still useless. I'm willing to test if anyone have patches but I don't have time to look at code myself. Best regards, Nicolai Petri