From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Dec 15 21:36:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B44FE8D139; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D2966379; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975) id 2E0AA19ED5; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:36:32 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: "Tobias C. Berner" , Jochen Neumeister , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456286 - head/www/nginx Message-ID: <20171215213632.GH81079@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712141007.vBEA74si099181@repo.freebsd.org> <20171215004922.GD81079@FreeBSD.org> <20171215194054.GG81079@FreeBSD.org> <6b68b8ee-86ad-e941-c021-60059891fbe9@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6b68b8ee-86ad-e941-c021-60059891fbe9@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:36:33 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 15/12/2017 ?? 20:40, Sergey A. Osokin a ??critš: > > Hi Tobias, > > > > objection because third-party fancyindex module update doesn't affect > > the final package anyhow. > > You mean that if you enable the fancyindex option, it is not compiled in > ? I do not understand. I've provided my explanation in previous email, so again - since third-party fancyindex module isn't enabled by default, the update of the module doesn't affect the final www/nginx package and this is why the PORTREVISION bump is needless here. Hope it's clear. -- Sergey A. Osokin