From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Aug 3 10:26:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from majordomo2.umd.edu (majordomo2.umd.edu [128.8.10.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E281414E4C for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 10:26:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac10.wam.umd.edu (root@rac10.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.150]) by majordomo2.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08578; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:25:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac10.wam.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac10.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA03004; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:25:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by rac10.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA03000; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:25:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: rac10.wam.umd.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:25:50 -0400 (EDT) From: James Howard To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: http://www.windows2000test.com/ and FreeBSD Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just saw on Slashdot that Microsoft has placed a Windows 2000 server on the internet and basically said "crack it" and show that NT security is flawed. This might be a chance for someone to place a FreeBSD server on the internet with the message "crack me" on it. I expect a properly configured FreeBSD server to be extremely secure (and moreso that NT). Additionally, it could be a chance to publically show-up the Linux crowd, especially if they decide not to try a similar test. I would do this myself, but I have neither the resources nor expertise. Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message