From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 19 16:54:05 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458F6F03;
 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:54:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065BE1FCF;
 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:54:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 9so13744445iec.19
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=LmPnsI1vMhoQ0lZdKjxXEkgV+EBkV6ilKmwy64H6+IU=;
 b=y8KCYt0wrGsJKeLsp6De0c0VdRUZ0QYnPUFELDmR0EkXUnasoOq1k7RFK399/vLj97
 7LrJjrRnkFyQHqK+79+ZvTmRFh3iby/+dHm0La7k+j+iDx72yCfroariwvHYX9ymoP3d
 067YtyNx31RyavCCkOPLh4DuozSFYBTlCYVLRic89xlyYflSClTxmXxa4SDH1DURPJaf
 7MjvJKgotZft8mteBhvfIeNOcjC31IddO3aN8VhpnaLxCJSbJR0+f0XnzT6xAFcxK0dA
 kcWNqPnUzlITyWz43hPCMz6LJOZ4dRiBCwdzoaZoRyJR5J4U6/J3q/PQ0JoEav8Vy8Jk
 H6sQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.107.106 with SMTP id hb10mr10685599igb.25.1371660844385; 
 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.225.163 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201306191332.r5JDWeqs006143@slippy.cwsent.com>
References: <guru@unixarea.de> <20130619132325.GB30671@sh4-5.1blu.de>
 <201306191332.r5JDWeqs006143@slippy.cwsent.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:54:04 +0300
Message-ID: <CALa-7vxh_fEJ1yzw+RSB23fo8JgyMydwvBPcnDQ9P9+zTOERMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ports && 10-CURRENT
From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>
To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, cy@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:54:05 -0000

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> wrote:
> You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do
> not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with
> it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate
> x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use
> devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not.
> There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if
> we don't need it. It's extra baggage.

If follow this logic, net/vnc should  to bundle it's own C compiler then...

-- 
Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>